Artisan
Artisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse Pad
The Artisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse Pad lands as a entry-level mouse pad, built around 4.
53/100
4
£80.60best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Above-average thickness
- Scores 53/100
- No stitched edges
- No water resistant
Score profile
Scored against the mouse pads classWhere the Artisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse Pad wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Size and shape
Thickness4 mm
Stitched edgesNo
More specs
Height49
Length40
MaterialCloth
Height49 cm
Length40 cm
Thickness4
Watch it in action
Powered by
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowArtisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse Pad vs HyperX Fury S Pro
Artisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse PadFury S Pro
| ArtisanArtisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse PadThis page | HyperXFury S Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53 /100 | 53 /100 |
| Thickness | 4 mm | 4 mm |
| Surface | — | cloth |
Who it's for
Is the Artisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse Pad right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable mouse pad for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need stitched edges, in which case a higher-tier mouse pad is the better call.
Competitive player
Cares about latency, precision and feel.
okay
Everyday user
Work and play, wants a reliable all-rounder.
good
Budget buyer
Wants solid basics without overspending.
okay
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the Artisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse Pad worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 53/100 against other mouse pads, a entry-level result where the class average is around 52.
What stands out on the Artisan FX Key-83 MID XL Mouse Pad?
Its thickness stands out, and more is better here, so a higher figure is the stronger pick.
How does it compare to the SteelSeries QcK XL?
The SteelSeries QcK XL scores 54/100 versus this one at 53/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
