compareelectronic
Home/Compare/Graphics Cards/ASUS DUAL GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
ASUS

ASUS DUAL GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

A compact, dual-fan take on Nvidia's 1440p sweet-spot card, with the DLSS 3 trickery and modest 220W draw that make it easy to slot into existing builds.

In stock12GB GDDR6XDLSS 3 with Frame Gen2.56-slot, dual fan220W TDP650W PSU minimum
ASUS DUAL GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12GB GDDR6XDLSS 3 with Frame Gen2.56-slot, dual fan220W TDP650W PSU minimumWatch review
Compare prices
Amazon UkLowest
In stock
£987›

Affiliate links, your price stays the same. How we check prices →

Our verdictCompare Electronic editors

A no-nonsense 1440p card with excellent ray tracing and DLSS 3 Frame Generation, in a relatively compact dual-fan shell.

75/100
vs. other £500 to £650 1440p GPUs
Scored within its class as a mid-to-high 1440p Nvidia card, not against current-gen 50 series flagships or 4K-focused GPUs.
Best price found
£987
30-day low £547 · Average £935
See £987 deal at Amazon Uk →

What we think

Swipe or tap to explore what we like, what to watch for, and who it's for

+

Sweet-spot 1440p performance

Comfortably runs modern games at 1440p high or ultra without resorting to upscaling. With DLSS Quality and Frame Generation, it can also handle 4K in most titles when paired with a strong CPU.

+

Strong ray tracing for the price

Third-gen RT cores combined with DLSS make heavy ray tracing actually viable, not just a slideshow. Cyberpunk and Alan Wake 2 run with RT enabled at playable frame rates with upscaling on.

+

Sensible 220W power draw

Modest power consumption for a card in this performance bracket. A quality 650W PSU is the official recommendation, so most existing builds will run it on their current power supply without trouble.

+

Compact for a partner card

The 2.56-slot, dual-fan design is slimmer than most aftermarket 4070 SUPER cards. Easier to fit in cramped cases or alongside large air coolers where triple-slot triple-fan beasts simply won't go.

In our testing

DLSS 3 Frame Generation makes a real difference in CPU-limited titles, often turning a 60 fps experience into a 100 fps one. Latency is slightly higher than native, but for single-player games it's a great trade.

−

12GB VRAM is starting to feel tight

Fine for 1440p today, but a few recent texture-heavy releases will push it at 4K ultra. Future-proofing buyers may prefer cards with 16GB or more, especially for mod-heavy gaming.

−

DUAL is the entry-tier ASUS cooler

Cooling is adequate rather than excellent. Under sustained load it runs warmer and louder than the pricier TUF or ROG Strix versions, though it stays well within safe temps in typical use.

−

Awkward 2.56-slot thickness

Slimmer than triple-slot rivals but still won't fit strict 2-slot only cases or slot configurations. Check your case and motherboard's PCIe slot spacing before committing, particularly in small form factor builds.

−

Last generation now

The 4070 SUPER is no longer Nvidia's current mid-range. Cards like the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 offer better performance per pound, so only buy if there's a meaningful price gap downward.

Worth knowing

Prices have softened since the 50 series launched. If you spot this card well under its launch RRP it's still a solid pick, but at full price the newer alternatives make more sense.

Best for

1440p gamers on a sensible budget

If you're driving a 1440p monitor, want strong ray tracing and the DLSS 3 ecosystem, and you've found this card at a meaningful discount versus current-gen options, it's a very capable choice.

Skip if

Future-proofers or 4K maximalists

If you want to keep your card for 5+ years or game at native 4K with heavy ray tracing, 12GB will feel limiting. A card with 16GB or more is a safer long-term bet at this price tier.

Our take

The 4070 SUPER is still a perfectly good 1440p GPU, but it's no longer the obvious value pick. Buy at a discount, or buy newer.

How it performs & what it pairs with

Benchmarks against named rivals, plus the build requirements to actually run it

Benchmarks
1440p ultra settings, DLSS Quality where applicable
Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p ultra, RT off)
RTX 4070 SUPER
106 fps avg
RTX 5070
117 fps avg
RX 7800 XT
102 fps avg
Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p ultra, RT ultra, DLSS Quality)
RTX 4070 SUPER
78 fps avg
RTX 5070
94 fps avg
RX 7800 XT
48 fps avg
Alan Wake 2 (1440p high, RT on, DLSS Quality)
RTX 4070 SUPER
72 fps avg
RTX 5070
83 fps avg
RX 7800 XT
49 fps avg
Test bench

Tested with a Ryzen 7 7800X3D, 32GB DDR5-6000, Windows 11 24H2 on an 850W PSU. Stock clocks, latest driver at time of testing.

Build compatibility
What your PC needs
✓
Power supply
650W is the official recommendation. Most builds with a reputable 650W or higher PSU will run it without buying anything new.
!
Case clearance (slot thickness)
The 2.56-slot design fits most mid-towers but blocks strict 2-slot only cases. Particularly worth checking in small form factor or mATX builds.
✓
Motherboard slot
Standard PCIe x16 slot, runs at PCIe 4.0 x16 speeds. Works fine on PCIe 3.0 boards with only a small performance hit in some titles.
!
CPU pairing
Best paired with a Ryzen 5 7600 or Core i5 13400 upwards. Older or slower CPUs will bottleneck it at 1080p and 1440p, especially with Frame Generation enabled.
✓
Cooling and noise
The dual-fan DUAL cooler is adequate for the 220W TDP but runs warmer and louder than ASUS's pricier TUF or ROG Strix versions under sustained load.

Performance breakdown

Scored relative to the class, not against flagship models

vs. other £500 to £650 1440p GPUs
75/100
Best in class scored 88
Class average 72
Lowest in class 50
1440p rasterisation80 / 100
Strong for 1440p, beaten by newer-gen cards at similar money
4K rasterisation65 / 100
Capable with DLSS, struggles at native 4K ultra in newer titles
Ray tracing82 / 100
Excellent RT performance for the tier, helped by mature DLSS support
Power efficiency80 / 100
220W TDP delivers solid performance per watt

Watch it in action

Powered byYouTube

Who this is right for

Picture yourself in these scenarios. How well does this fit?

1440p gamer with a small case
Building or upgrading a compact ATX or mATX system at 1440p. The slimmer 2.56-slot DUAL fits where bulkier triple-fan cards won't, while still delivering top-tier 1440p frame rates.
Excellent fit
DLSS and ray tracing fan
Plays single-player AAA games with all the eye candy on, including ray tracing. Frame Generation and DLSS Quality together make demanding RT titles run smoothly without upgrading further up the stack.
Good fit
Casual 4K gamer
Plays at 4K, mostly older or less demanding titles. Will get a smooth experience with DLSS Quality, but newest releases at 4K ultra will push the 12GB VRAM uncomfortably.
Okay fit
Future-proof builder on AM5
Building now and planning to keep the GPU for 5+ years. 12GB and last-gen architecture mean this card will age faster than 16GB current-gen alternatives at similar money.
Look elsewhere

What every spec actually means

Numbers translated into real-world impact

vram_gb12

Fine for 1440p today but starting to feel tight at 4K ultra in the most demanding new releases. Better than 8GB cards, behind the 16GB pack in long-term headroom.

tdp_w220

Moderate power draw for the performance on offer. A 650W PSU is the official recommendation, so most existing builds will run it on their current power supply without upgrading.

dlss_version3

Supports DLSS 3 with Frame Generation, which roughly doubles frame rates in supported games. A big draw for buying Nvidia at this price tier, especially in CPU-limited scenarios.

ray_tracing_generation3rd Gen

Nvidia's third generation of RT cores, paired with DLSS for usable ray tracing in heavy titles. Still the benchmark for ray traced gaming at this price.

memory_bandwidth_gbps504

Decent bandwidth thanks to 21 Gbps GDDR6X, but the narrow 192-bit bus limits headroom at 4K. Fine for 1440p, slightly held back when textures get really heavy at higher resolutions.

slots2.56

Slimmer than most triple-fan partner cards but still over two slots. Fine in most mid-towers, can be a tight fit in strict two-slot only builds or alongside thick CPU coolers.

Complete specifications

Verified across manufacturer datasheets and retailer spec tables

All specs
slots
2.56
2 to 3.5 slots typical, this is 2.56
tdp w
220
200 to 285W class range, this is 220
vram gb
12
12 to 16GB typical, this is at the low end
gpu chip
AD104
·
fan count
2
2 to 3 typical, this has 2
cuda cores
7168
·
hdmi count
1
1 to 2 typical, this has 1
memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR6 or GDDR6X in class, this is GDDR6X
architecture
Ada Lovelace
·
dlss version
3
DLSS 3 or 4 in class, this is DLSS 3
hdmi version
2.1
HDMI 2.1 standard across class
release year
2024
·
tensor cores
224
·
base clock mhz
1980
·
lithography nm
4
4nm or 5nm typical, this is 4nm
memory bus bit
192
192 to 256-bit typical, this is 192-bit
boost clock mhz
2505
2400 to 2700 MHz typical, this is 2505
displayport count
3
2 to 3 typical, this has 3
memory speed gbps
21
18 to 28 Gbps class range, this is 21
ray tracing cores
56
·
displayport version
1.4a
DP 1.4a or 2.1 in class, this is 1.4a
psu recommendation w
650
650 to 750W typical, this is 650
memory bandwidth gbps
504
440 to 720 GB/s class range, this is 504
ray tracing generation
3rd Gen
·

Common questions

The things people ask before buying this product

Is the RTX 4070 SUPER still worth buying in 2026?

Only at a meaningful discount. The card itself is still a strong 1440p performer with great DLSS 3 support, but newer cards like the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 offer better value at full price now.

Will the ASUS DUAL 4070 SUPER fit my case?

It's 2.56 slots thick, which fits most mid-tower cases but won't squeeze into strict 2-slot configurations. Check your case's GPU clearance, particularly in mATX or ITX builds, before committing.

What PSU do I need for the RTX 4070 SUPER?

Nvidia recommends a 650W PSU, which is plenty for most builds. A quality unit from a reputable brand at 650W or above will have comfortable headroom even with a power-hungry CPU.

Is 12GB of VRAM enough for 4K gaming?

For most current games at 4K with DLSS, yes. The newest texture-heavy releases push that limit, and modded games can exceed it. For long-term 4K ultra gaming, 16GB cards are a safer choice.

If this isn't quite right

Better alternatives depending on what you actually need

Cheaper sibling
nvidia geforce rtx 4070
The non-SUPER drops a chunk of CUDA cores for a noticeably lower price, fine if you don't need the extra performance for 1440p ultra.
See review →
AMD competitor
amd radeon rx 7800 xt
Similar rasterisation performance with 16GB of VRAM, but weaker ray tracing and no equivalent to DLSS 3 Frame Generation.
See review →
Current-gen upgrade
nvidia geforce rtx 5070
The newer successor with DLSS 4 and Frame Generation upgrades, better performance at similar money once stock settles.
See review →
Compare Electronic editors
Independent graphics cards comparison since 2025
Every product is scored against its own product class, not against flagship models. Spec data is cross-checked across manufacturer datasheets and multiple retailer spec tables. Prices are verified daily. We never rank by affiliate commission.
Read our methodology