HyperX
HyperX QuadCast 2 S
A solid mid-range usb microphone for listeners who care how it sounds, leading with Dynamic.
56/100
Dynamic
£119best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- USB-C
- Scores 56/100
- No headphone monitoring
- No xlr output
Score profile
Scored against the usb microphones classWhere the HyperX QuadCast 2 S wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Capsule and design
TypeDynamic
Connectivity and controls
USB-CYes
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowHyperX QuadCast 2 S vs Sennheiser Sennheiser Profile USB Microphone
HyperX QuadCast 2 SSennheiser Profile USB Microphone
| HyperXHyperX QuadCast 2 SThis page | SennheiserSennheiser Profile USB Microphone | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56 /100 | 56 /100 |
| Type | Dynamic | Condenser |
Who it's for
Is the HyperX QuadCast 2 S right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable usb microphone for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need headphone monitoring, in which case a higher-tier usb microphone is the better call.
Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
okay
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
excellent
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the HyperX QuadCast 2 S worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 56/100 against other usb microphones, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 54.
What stands out on the HyperX QuadCast 2 S?
Its usb-c stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.
How does it compare to the Logitech Blue Yeti Nano?
The Logitech Blue Yeti Nano scores 58/100 versus this one at 56/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
