Marshall
Marshall Middleton II
The Marshall Middleton II lands as a solid mid-range bluetooth speaker, built around 30 hours.
58/100
30 hoursIP67
£223best price at Amazon
In stock at 2 retailers
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Above-average battery life
- Scores 58/100
- No stereo pairing
Score profile
Scored against the bluetooth speakers classWhere the Marshall Middleton II wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Battery
Battery life30 hours
Design
IP ratingIP67
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowMarshall Middleton II vs Sonos Sonos Move - Wireless Speaker Black
Marshall Middleton IISonos Move - Wireless Speaker Black
| MarshallMarshall Middleton IIThis page | SonosSonos Move - Wireless Speaker Black | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58 /100Better | 44 /100 |
| Battery hours | 30 hoursBetter | 11 hours |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP56 |
| Bluetooth | — | 4.1 |
| Weight | — | 3000 g |
Who it's for
Is the Marshall Middleton II right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable bluetooth speaker for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need stereo pairing, in which case a higher-tier bluetooth speaker is the better call.
Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
good
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the Marshall Middleton II worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 58/100 against other bluetooth speakers, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 56.
What stands out on the Marshall Middleton II?
Its battery life stands out, how long it runs between charges, so you spend less time tethered to a cable.
How does it compare to the JBL Charge 6?
The JBL Charge 6 scores 59/100 versus this one at 58/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
