Philips
Philips TAT2200BK
The Philips TAT2200BK lands as a solid mid-range wireless earphone, built around 8 hours.
56/100
8 hours36 hoursIPX46.0
£29.99best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Active noise cancelling
- Multipoint pairing
- Touch controls
- Below-average battery (earbuds)
Score profile
Scored against the wireless earphones classWhere the Philips TAT2200BK wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Design and build
IP rating (earbuds)IPX4
Sound
Active noise cancellingYes
Battery and power
Battery (earbuds)8 hours
Battery (with case)36 hours
Fast charge (5/10 min)10
Connectivity
Bluetooth version6
Multipoint pairingYes
Microphone and features
Microphones (per earbud)4
Touch controlsYes
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowPhilips TAT2200BK vs Sony Sony WF-C710NSA
Philips TAT2200BKSony WF-C710NSA
| PhilipsPhilips TAT2200BKThis page | SonySony WF-C710NSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56 /100 | 56 /100 |
| Battery hours | 8 hoursBetter | 1 hours |
| Battery total | 36 hours | 40 hoursBetter |
| ANC | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.3 |
| IP rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
Who it's for
Is the Philips TAT2200BK right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable wireless earphone for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need reference-grade sound and features, in which case a higher-tier wireless earphone is the better call.
Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
okay
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the Philips TAT2200BK worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 56/100 against other wireless earphones, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 58.
What stands out on the Philips TAT2200BK?
Its active noise cancelling stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.
How does it compare to the Final VR3000 Wireless?
The Final VR3000 Wireless scores 57/100 versus this one at 56/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
