Pulsar
eS PD170
A solid mid-range pick in the mouse pads line-up, with 5.5 up front.
58/100
5.5
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Above-average thickness
- Scores 58/100
- No stitched edges
- No water resistant
Score profile
Scored against the mouse pads classWhere the eS PD170 wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Size and shape
Thickness5.5 mm
Stitched edgesNo
More specs
Height48
Length40
MaterialCloth
Height48 cm
Length40 cm
Thickness5.5
Glide typeSpeed
Foam firmnessFirm
Overall glideSpeed
Static frictionMedium
Dynamic frictionVery Low
Glide difference5.3 %
Glide difference x y5.3
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that roweS PD170 vs VAXEE PD151
eS PD170PD151
| PulsareS PD170This page | VAXEEPD151 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58 /100 | 58 /100 |
| Thickness | 5.5 mm | 5.5 mm |
Who it's for
Is the eS PD170 right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable mouse pad for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need stitched edges, in which case a higher-tier mouse pad is the better call.
Competitive player
Cares about latency, precision and feel.
good
Everyday user
Work and play, wants a reliable all-rounder.
good
Budget buyer
Wants solid basics without overspending.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the eS PD170 worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 58/100 against other mouse pads, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 52.
What stands out on the eS PD170?
Its thickness stands out, and more is better here, so a higher figure is the stronger pick.
How does it compare to the PD150?
The PD150 scores 59/100 versus this one at 58/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
