Pulsar
X2H Es
A solid mid-range pick in the gaming mice line-up, with 65 up front.
66/100
65PX2H3ES21Ambidextrous
£59.98best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Wireless
- Above-average max dpi
- Above-average max ips
- No 2.4 ghz wireless
Score profile
Scored against the gaming mice classWhere the X2H Es wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Sensor
Sensor modelPX2H3ES21
Max DPI26000
Max IPS750
Design and build
Weight65 g
ShapeAmbidextrous
Wireless and connectivity
WirelessYes
More specs
Width6.5
Height3.9
Length12
SensorPMW 3395
SwitchesOptical Switches
ConnectionWireless
Button switchesOptical Switches
Max polling rate8000
Dimensions hwl3.9 cm
Max polling rate8000 Hz
Watch it in action
Powered by
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowX2H Es vs Pulsar X2 Mini
X2H EsX2 Mini
| PulsarX2H EsThis page | PulsarX2 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66 /100 | 66 /100 |
| Max dpi | 26000 | 26000 |
| Weight | 65 g | 52 gBetter |
| Max IPS | 750 | 750 |
Who it's for
Is the X2H Es right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable gaming mice for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need 2.4 ghz wireless, in which case a higher-tier gaming mice is the better call.
Competitive player
Cares about latency, precision and feel.
good
Everyday user
Work and play, wants a reliable all-rounder.
good
Budget buyer
Wants solid basics without overspending.
excellent
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the X2H Es worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 66/100 against other gaming mice, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 59.
What stands out on the X2H Es?
Its wireless stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.
How does it compare to the BEAST X Black?
The BEAST X Black scores 67/100 versus this one at 66/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
