Pulsar
Xlite v4 Mini Quiccs Edition
The Xlite v4 Mini Quiccs Edition lands as a solid mid-range gaming mice, built around PXL41QCS.
59/100
PXL41QCSergonomic
£74.98best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Wireless
- Above-average max dpi
- Above-average max ips
- No 2.4 ghz wireless
Score profile
Scored against the gaming mice classWhere the Xlite v4 Mini Quiccs Edition wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Sensor
Sensor modelPXL41QCS
Max DPI32000
Max IPS750
Design and build
Shapeergonomic
Wireless and connectivity
WirelessYes
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowXlite v4 Mini Quiccs Edition vs Lamzu Atlantis 4K
Xlite v4 Mini Quiccs EditionAtlantis 4K
| PulsarXlite v4 Mini Quiccs EditionThis page | LamzuAtlantis 4K | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59 /100 | 65 /100Better |
| Max dpi | 32000Better | 26000 |
| Weight | — | 55 g |
| Max IPS | 750Better | 650 |
Who it's for
Is the Xlite v4 Mini Quiccs Edition right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable gaming mice for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need 2.4 ghz wireless, in which case a higher-tier gaming mice is the better call.
Competitive player
Cares about latency, precision and feel.
good
Everyday user
Work and play, wants a reliable all-rounder.
good
Budget buyer
Wants solid basics without overspending.
excellent
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the Xlite v4 Mini Quiccs Edition worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 59/100 against other gaming mice, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 59.
What stands out on the Xlite v4 Mini Quiccs Edition?
Its wireless stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.
How does it compare to the A950 AIR?
The A950 AIR scores 60/100 versus this one at 59/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
