RØDE
RØDE NT1 5th Generation
The RØDE NT1 5th Generation lands as a entry-level studio microphone, built around Studio Microphones.
50/100
Studio Microphones
£231best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Scores 50/100
- Built for the job
- No switchable polar patterns
- No high-pass filter
Score profile
Scored against the studio microphones classWhere the RØDE NT1 5th Generation wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
More specs
ConnectionXLR
Watch it in action
Powered by
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowRØDE NT1 5th Generation vs RODE RODE NT1 Signature Series
RØDE NT1 5th GenerationRODE NT1 Signature Series
| RØDERØDE NT1 5th GenerationThis page | RODERODE NT1 Signature Series | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50 /100 | 50 /100 |
| Polar pattern | — | cardioid |
| Weight | — | 313 g |
Who it's for
Is the RØDE NT1 5th Generation right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable studio microphone for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need switchable polar patterns, in which case a higher-tier studio microphone is the better call.
Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
okay
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the RØDE NT1 5th Generation worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 50/100 against other studio microphones, a entry-level result where the class average is around 51.
What stands out on the RØDE NT1 5th Generation?
Its overall 50/100 rating against the rest of the studio microphones class.
How does it compare to the Ortizan XLR/USB Dynamic Microphone?
The Ortizan XLR/USB Dynamic Microphone scores 55/100 versus this one at 50/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
