Rode
NT-USB
A entry-level pick in the usb microphones line-up, with USB Microphones up front.
50/100
USB Microphones
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Scores 50/100
- Compared on the spec sheet
- No usb-c
- No headphone monitoring
Score profile
Scored against the usb microphones classWhere the NT-USB wins and loses
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowNT-USB vs HyperX HyperX QuadCast S
NT-USBHyperX QuadCast S
| RodeNT-USBThis page | HyperXHyperX QuadCast S | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50 /100 | 50 /100 |
| Type | — | Condenser |
Who it's for
Is the NT-USB right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable usb microphone for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need usb-c, in which case a higher-tier usb microphone is the better call.
Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
okay
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the NT-USB worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 50/100 against other usb microphones, a entry-level result where the class average is around 54.
What stands out on the NT-USB?
Its overall 50/100 rating against the rest of the usb microphones class.
How does it compare to the Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X?
The Audio-Technica AT2020USB-X scores 52/100 versus this one at 50/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
