Shokz
OpenRun Pro 2
A entry-level pick in the wireless earphones line-up, with 12 hours up front.
51/100
12 hours5.3open-ear
£169best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- USB-C charging
- Above-average battery (earbuds)
- No active noise cancelling
Score profile
Scored against the wireless earphones classWhere the OpenRun Pro 2 wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Design and build
Fitopen-ear
Battery and power
Battery (earbuds)12 hours
USB-C chargingYes
Connectivity
Bluetooth version5.3
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowOpenRun Pro 2 vs Cervanta Cervanta Wireless Earbuds
OpenRun Pro 2Cervanta Wireless Earbuds
| ShokzOpenRun Pro 2This page | CervantaCervanta Wireless Earbuds | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51 /100 | 52 /100Better |
| Battery hours | 12 hours | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Who it's for
Is the OpenRun Pro 2 right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable wireless earphone for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need active noise cancelling, in which case a higher-tier wireless earphone is the better call.
Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
okay
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
excellent
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the OpenRun Pro 2 worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 51/100 against other wireless earphones, a entry-level result where the class average is around 58.
What stands out on the OpenRun Pro 2?
Its usb-c charging stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.
How does it compare to the 2026 Wireless Earbuds?
The 2026 Wireless Earbuds scores 52/100 versus this one at 51/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
