Shure
Shure SM7B
The Shure SM7B lands as a solid mid-range studio microphone, built around cardioid.
55/100
cardioidDynamic Microphone
£345best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Shock mount included
- Scores 55/100
- No switchable polar patterns
- No high-pass filter
Score profile
Scored against the studio microphones classWhere the Shure SM7B wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Audio
Polar patterncardioid
Capsule
TypeDynamic Microphone
Accessories included
Shock mount includedYes
More specs
ConnectionXLR
Pop filterYes
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowShure SM7B vs RØDE RØDE NT1 Signature Series
Shure SM7BRØDE NT1 Signature Series
| ShureShure SM7BThis page | RØDERØDE NT1 Signature Series | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55 /100 | 55 /100 |
| Polar pattern | cardioid | cardioid |
| Type | Dynamic Microphone | Large-diaphragm condenser microphone |
Who it's for
Is the Shure SM7B right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable studio microphone for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need switchable polar patterns, in which case a higher-tier studio microphone is the better call.
Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
okay
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the Shure SM7B worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 55/100 against other studio microphones, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 51.
What stands out on the Shure SM7B?
Its shock mount included stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.
How does it compare to the Shure SM4?
The Shure SM4 scores 50/100 versus this one at 55/100, so this is the stronger pick on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
