SteelSeries
SteelSeries QcK Hard M
A solid mid-range mouse pad for PC and console players, leading with 320 x 270 mm (Size M).
60/100
320 x 270 mm (Size M)6 mmHard polypropylene
£31.18best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Above-average thickness
- Scores 60/100
- No stitched edges
- No water resistant
Score profile
Scored against the mouse pads classWhere the SteelSeries QcK Hard M wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Size and shape
Size320
Thickness6 mm
Surface
SurfaceHard polypropylene
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowSteelSeries QcK Hard M vs Fnatic FOCUS3 MAX
SteelSeries QcK Hard MFOCUS3 MAX
| SteelSeriesSteelSeries QcK Hard MThis page | FnaticFOCUS3 MAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60 /100 | 60 /100 |
| Size | 320 | — |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Surface | Hard polypropylene | — |
Who it's for
Is the SteelSeries QcK Hard M right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable mouse pad for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need stitched edges, in which case a higher-tier mouse pad is the better call.
Competitive player
Cares about latency, precision and feel.
good
Everyday user
Work and play, wants a reliable all-rounder.
good
Budget buyer
Wants solid basics without overspending.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the SteelSeries QcK Hard M worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 60/100 against other mouse pads, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 52.
What stands out on the SteelSeries QcK Hard M?
Its thickness stands out, and more is better here, so a higher figure is the stronger pick.
How does it compare to the Logitech G G840?
The Logitech G G840 scores 62/100 versus this one at 60/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
