SteelSeries
SteelSeries QcK L
A entry-level mouse pad for PC and console players, leading with 490 x 420 mm.
49/100
490 x 420 mm3.5 mmNeoprene rubber
£39.98best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- Stitched edges
- Scores 49/100
- No water resistant
- No non-slip base
Score profile
Scored against the mouse pads classWhere the SteelSeries QcK L wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Size and shape
Size490
Length420 mm
Width490 mm
Thickness3.5 mm
Stitched edgesYes
Surface
SurfaceNeoprene rubber
Watch it in action
Powered by
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowSteelSeries QcK L vs Solstice Arrival
SteelSeries QcK LArrival
| SteelSeriesSteelSeries QcK LThis page | SolsticeArrival | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49 /100 | 53 /100Better |
| Size | 490 | — |
| Length | 420 mm | — |
| Thickness | 3.5 mm | 3.8 mmBetter |
| Surface | Neoprene rubber | — |
| Width | 490 mm | — |
Who it's for
Is the SteelSeries QcK L right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable mouse pad for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need water resistant, in which case a higher-tier mouse pad is the better call.
Competitive player
Cares about latency, precision and feel.
okay
Everyday user
Work and play, wants a reliable all-rounder.
good
Budget buyer
Wants solid basics without overspending.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the SteelSeries QcK L worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 49/100 against other mouse pads, a entry-level result where the class average is around 52.
What stands out on the SteelSeries QcK L?
Its stitched edges stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.
How does it compare to the 3XL?
The 3XL scores 50/100 versus this one at 49/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
