SteelSeries

SteelSeries QcK L Performance

A entry-level pick in the mouse pads line-up, with 490 x 420 mm up front.

49/100
Mixed bag
Overall score · how we rate
490 x 420 mm3.5 mmNeoprene rubber
£36.49best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer

We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.

Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily

Why we rate it

  • Stitched edges
  • Scores 49/100
  • No water resistant
  • No non-slip base
Score profile

Where the SteelSeries QcK L Performance wins and loses

Scored against the mouse pads class
SizeOverallValue564949
Size and shape
56
Overall spec score
49
Value position
49
Full specification

Specifications

Grouped · supported features marked in blue

Size and shape

Size490
Length420 mm
Width490 mm
Thickness3.5 mm
Stitched edgesYes

Surface

SurfaceNeoprene rubber

Watch it in action

Powered byYouTube
Head to head

SteelSeries QcK L Performance vs Solstice Arrival

Highlighted cell = better in that row
SizeOverallValue
SteelSeries QcK L PerformanceArrival
 SteelSeriesSteelSeries QcK L PerformanceThis pageSolsticeArrival
Overall score49 /10053 /100Better
Size490
Length420 mm
Thickness3.5 mm3.8 mmBetter
SurfaceNeoprene rubber
Width490 mm
Who it's for

Is the SteelSeries QcK L Performance right for you?

Buy it if
Buyers on a budget

Anyone who needs a dependable mouse pad for the essentials without overspending.

Skip it if
Skip it if

You need water resistant, in which case a higher-tier mouse pad is the better call.

Competitive player
Cares about latency, precision and feel.
okay
Everyday user
Work and play, wants a reliable all-rounder.
good
Budget buyer
Wants solid basics without overspending.
good
Common questions

Before you buy

Is the SteelSeries QcK L Performance worth it?

It depends on what you need. It scores 49/100 against other mouse pads, a entry-level result where the class average is around 52.

What stands out on the SteelSeries QcK L Performance?

Its stitched edges stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.

How does it compare to the 3XL?

The 3XL scores 50/100 versus this one at 49/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.