Fnatic

FOCUS3 MAX

The FOCUS3 MAX lands as a solid mid-range mouse pad, built around 6.

60/100
Solid pick
Overall score · how we rate
6

We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.

Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily

Why we rate it

  • Above-average thickness
  • Scores 60/100
  • No stitched edges
  • No water resistant
Score profile

Where the FOCUS3 MAX wins and loses

Scored against the mouse pads class
SizeOverallValue846060
Size and shape
84
Overall spec score
60
Value position
60
Full specification

Specifications

Grouped · supported features marked in blue

Size and shape

Thickness6 mm
Stitched edgesNo

More specs

Height48
Length40
MaterialCloth
Height48 cm
Length40 cm
Thickness6
Glide typeControl-Oriented
Foam firmnessSoft
Overall glideControl-Oriented
Static frictionMedium
Dynamic frictionMedium
Glide difference4.7 %
Glide difference x y4.7
Head to head

FOCUS3 MAX vs SteelSeries QcK Heavy

Highlighted cell = better in that row
SizeOverallValue
FOCUS3 MAXQcK Heavy
 FnaticFOCUS3 MAXThis pageSteelSeriesQcK Heavy
Overall score60 /10060 /100
Thickness6 mm6 mm
Surfacecloth
Who it's for

Is the FOCUS3 MAX right for you?

Buy it if
Buyers on a budget

Anyone who needs a dependable mouse pad for the essentials without overspending.

Skip it if
Skip it if

You need stitched edges, in which case a higher-tier mouse pad is the better call.

Competitive player
Cares about latency, precision and feel.
good
Everyday user
Work and play, wants a reliable all-rounder.
good
Budget buyer
Wants solid basics without overspending.
good
Common questions

Before you buy

Is the FOCUS3 MAX worth it?

It depends on what you need. It scores 60/100 against other mouse pads, a solid mid-range result where the class average is around 52.

What stands out on the FOCUS3 MAX?

Its thickness stands out, and more is better here, so a higher figure is the stronger pick.

How does it compare to the Logitech G G840?

The Logitech G G840 scores 62/100 versus this one at 60/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.