RØDE

RØDE NT-USB+

A entry-level pick in the usb microphones line-up, with 48 kHz up front.

52/100
Mixed bag
Overall score · how we rate
48 kHzCondenser
£132best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer

We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.

Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily

Why we rate it

  • USB-C
  • Headphone monitoring
  • Above-average bit depth
  • No xlr output
  • No noise suppression in software
Score profile

Where the RØDE NT-USB+ wins and loses

Scored against the usb microphones class
AudioConnectivityOverall478152
Audio
47
Connectivity and controls
81
Overall spec score
52
Full specification

Specifications

Grouped · supported features marked in blue

Audio

Sample rate48
Bit depth24

Capsule and design

TypeCondenser

Connectivity and controls

USB-CYes
Headphone monitoringYes
Head to head

RØDE NT-USB+ vs RØDE RØDE NT1 5th Generation

Highlighted cell = better in that row
AudioConnectivityOverall
RØDE NT-USB+RØDE NT1 5th Generation
 RØDERØDE NT-USB+This pageRØDERØDE NT1 5th Generation
Overall score52 /10064 /100Better
Sample rate khz48192Better
Bit depth24
TypeCondenserCondenser
Weight94 g
Who it's for

Is the RØDE NT-USB+ right for you?

Buy it if
Buyers on a budget

Anyone who needs a dependable usb microphone for the essentials without overspending.

Skip it if
Skip it if

You need xlr output, in which case a higher-tier usb microphone is the better call.

Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
okay
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
excellent
Common questions

Before you buy

Is the RØDE NT-USB+ worth it?

It depends on what you need. It scores 52/100 against other usb microphones, a entry-level result where the class average is around 54.

What stands out on the RØDE NT-USB+?

Its usb-c stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.

How does it compare to the AT2020?

The AT2020 scores 54/100 versus this one at 52/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.