RØDE
Rode NT1-A Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone
A entry-level usb microphone for listeners who care how it sounds, leading with Condenser.
54/100
Condenser
£201best price at Amazon
In stock at 1 retailer
We may earn a commission on purchases via this link. It never affects our scores or rankings.
Independent score · no sponsored placement
Price checked across retailers daily
Why we rate it
- XLR output
- Scores 54/100
- No usb-c
- No headphone monitoring
Score profile
Scored against the usb microphones classWhere the Rode NT1-A Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone wins and loses
Full specification
Grouped · supported features marked in blueSpecifications
Capsule and design
TypeCondenser
Connectivity and controls
XLR outputYes
Watch it in action
Powered by
Head to head
Highlighted cell = better in that rowRode NT1-A Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone vs Blue Blue Yeti Nano Premium
Rode NT1-A Large-Diaphragm Condenser MicrophoneBlue Yeti Nano Premium
| RØDERode NT1-A Large-Diaphragm Condenser MicrophoneThis page | BlueBlue Yeti Nano Premium | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54 /100 | 54 /100 |
| Type | Condenser | Condenser |
Who it's for
Is the Rode NT1-A Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone right for you?
Buy it if
Buyers on a budget
Anyone who needs a dependable usb microphone for the essentials without overspending.
Skip it if
Skip it if
You need usb-c, in which case a higher-tier usb microphone is the better call.
Critical listener
Cares about detail, tuning and codec support.
okay
Everyday listener
Music, calls and commuting, wants a safe all-rounder.
good
Value seeker
Wants the most sound for the least outlay.
good
Common questions
Before you buy
Is the Rode NT1-A Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone worth it?
It depends on what you need. It scores 54/100 against other usb microphones, a entry-level result where the class average is around 54.
What stands out on the Rode NT1-A Large-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone?
Its xlr output stands out, a genuinely useful feature if your setup calls for it.
How does it compare to the HyperX QuadCast 2 S?
The HyperX QuadCast 2 S scores 56/100 versus this one at 54/100, so it is the step up on the spec sheet.
You might also consider
